Left Menu
Life News
Are we using our memory for the glory of God? by Timothy Raymond
Can we in good conscience vote for Labor? by Andrew Lansdown and Dwight A. Randall
National MP slams perversity of Safe Schools program
Adult children of gay parents testify against same-sex marriage by Kirsten Andersen
Domestic Violence: Women can be as abusive as men by Dr Augusto Zimmerman
With the Lord: Wilma Drew
18th Annual Walk and Rally for Life
Former senator speaks up for the unborn by Joe Bullock
Qurans deadly role in inspiring Belgian slaughter by Nabeel Qureshi
Germany:Christian refugees persecuted by Muslims by Soeren Kern
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
by Andrew Lansdown
One for All
A Son to the war
Becoming a Christian
Train home
Sons Laid Down Their Lives
An Accurate Diagnosis
Starting again
Following hard after God
Starving our children
The first duty of fatherhood
The origin of fatherhood
An Easter Song
A Christmas carol
For This Purpose
In royal David's city
God's Placard
Believing the Bible: the issue of inerrancy
Marriage according to scripture
A biblical perspective on prostitution
Prostitution and social justice
Abortion: A biblical perspective
If people were dogs & other false arguments for euthanasia
How porn harms us
How Green is God?
Christians and Politics
When Christians Take Their Lives
The High Kings Watchmen

Social action and evangelical concern


Social action and
evangelical concern

by Andrew Lansdown

Many Christians object to attempts to safeguard moral standards through social action and state regulation. They dislike, and even disparage, fellow Christians who get involved in lobbying, protesting and consciousness-raising on sexual and sanctity-of-life issues. They shy away from signing petitions, writing letters, attending rallies or joining political parties, especially if the purpose is to defend biblical standards relating to matters such as abortion, pornography, homosexuality or prostitution.

Some Christians oppose social action on the “moral front” because they have been influenced by liberal theology and/or leftist ideology. They believe that “personal morality” can be separated from “social justice”, and that the latter is immensely more important than the former. They are deeply mistaken in both these assumptions, but they are not my concern here.

The Christians I am concerned about are Bible-believing, evangelical Christians. They appear to have two principal reasons for rejecting Christian social action. Their first argument is that acts of parliament cannot make people morally upright. Their second argument is that the principal task of every Christian is to evangelise the lost.

Now, I happen to agree with both these assertions. The law cannot make a person good; and every Christian’s primary task is to minister to every person’s principal need, which is new life in Christ. I agree. However, I disagree that these truths negate our social and spiritual duty to be salt and light in the world.

It is a mistake to think that social action and evangelical outreach are in conflict. Far from working against each other, the two can and must work hand in hand, sharing the common goal of bringing people to Christ. In short, action on the “moral front” can support action on the “missionary front”.

Laws relating to sexual morality, for example, may on occasions bring a person under conviction of sin. While it is lamentable, it is nonetheless true that many people today are living in a moral vacuum. They have no objective standards by which to live. For such people, the law is often the last arbiter on moral issues. Consequently, the only things they consider to be immoral are those things they know to be illegal.

Paul’s comment about the Mosaic law is valid for our national law: “through the law comes knowledge of sin.” Indeed, Paul claimed, “if it had not been for the law, I should not have known sin. I should not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, ‘You shall not covet’” (Romans 3:20; 7:7).

If the law can either reveal evil or arouse guilt then it can serve the cause of the gospel. The law cannot save, but it can produce a consciousness of sin, which in turn can prompt a consciousness of a need for forgiveness. In short, the law can be a schoolmaster to lead a person to Christ, so that he or she might be justified by faith (Galatians 3:24).

The numbing of the conscience is a powerful enemy of the gospel. People who do not recognise that they are sinners cannot recognise their need for the Saviour. Christians ought to strive to preserve anything that reminds people of their sin. And such striving ought to be viewed as part of a wider evangelical concern.

Further, social action can provide opportunities for evangelical witness. For example, asking a non-Christian to sign a petition opposing the public funding of abortion may open the way to speak about Jesus. Birth is an analogy for new birth, after all. And a concern for the natural life of every person is one way to demonstrate a concern for the eternal life of a particular person. The Christian who, as an ambassador for Christ, tries to save someone’s physical life will certainly not be viewed as a hypocrite when he tries to save someone’s spiritual life. “All life is valuable” and “eternal life is available to all”: these two truths rejoice in each other.

The same Lord who said, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel” (Mark 16:15), also said, “You are the salt of the earth”, and, “You are the light of the world” (Matthew 5:13-16). Indeed, he declared that if the salt has lost its taste, “It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trodden under foot by men.” It would seem from this statement that the Christian who has lost his moral savour is useless even as a witness for the Saviour.

By God’s grace and decree, Christians are different from other people. We should not deny or attempt to conceal this. We should let our light so shine before men that they are dazzled by it. Everything about us, from attitude to action to reaction, ought to be different from our neighbours, because the life we now live we live by faith in the Son of God, who loved us and gave himself for us (Galatians 2:20). And while the difference may sometimes cause misunderstandings, it may also dispel them. It may awaken an awareness of sin, righteousness and judgment, so that people might see Jesus, “the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29).

Social and evangelical concerns overlap at yet another point. Christians who withstand evil on the social front free others to work on the evangelical front. More than this, they provide the conditions for that freedom.

Government legislation and public attitudes determine whether or not the gospel may be freely proclaimed and Bibles freely distributed. Some Christians seem to be unaware that they are free to hand out Bibles and to hold crusades in this country because it is lawful for them to do so. If governments enact extensive legislation contrary to Christian morality, how long will it be before the Bible and its believers are condemned as opponents of the law?

Decency and perversity are antagonistic to each other: they cannot co-exist for long: one must destroy the other. When a society grants the freedom to practise perversity, it soon denies the freedom to practise decency.

Consider homosexual law “reform” by way of example. Decriminalisation and anti-discrimination legislation usually go hand in hand. In its effort to protect homosexual “rights” through anti-discrimination legislation, a government may ban from schools and public libraries books that condemn homosexual acts. The Bible is such a book.

Evangelical and social concerns cannot be separated. The man who stands watch with a sword enables another to build with a trowel. But the builder must not think that he can do without the soldier. He is free to build so long as the soldier is at his post, and no longer.

Of course, the soldier and the builder are often the same person. It would be a mistake to think that a Christian can only be one or the other. Ideally, every Christian should be like the Jews who rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem towards the end of the Babylonian exile: “Those who carried burdens were laden in such a way that each with one hand laboured on the work and with the other held his weapon” (Nehemiah 4:17-18).


Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
2015 Vol 3 Jul - Sep
2015 Vol 2 Apr - Jun
2015 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2014 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2014 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2014 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2014 Vol 2 Apr - May
2014 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2013 Vol 5 Dec - Jan
2013 Vol 4 Sep - Nov
2013 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2013 Vol 2 Apr - May
2013 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2012 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2012 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2012 Vol 3 May - Jul
2012 Vol 2 Mar - Apr
2012 Vol 1 Jan - Feb
2011 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2011 Vol 2 Apr - May
2011 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2010 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2010 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2010 Vol 2 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 2 Apr - May
2010 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2009 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2009 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2009 Vol 2 Apr - May
2009 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2008 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2008 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2008 Vol 3 Jun - July
2008 Vol 2 Apr - May
2008 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2007 Vol 5 Nov - Jan
2007 Vol 4 Aug - Oct
2007 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2007 Vol 2 Apr - May
2007 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2006 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2006 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2006 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2006 Vol 2 Apr - May
2006 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2005 Vol 6 Dec - Jan
2005 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2005 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2005 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2005 Vol 2 Apr - May
2005 Vol 1 Feb - Mar