Left Menu
Life News
Are we using our memory for the glory of God? by Timothy Raymond
Can we in good conscience vote for Labor? by Andrew Lansdown and Dwight A. Randall
National MP slams perversity of Safe Schools program
Adult children of gay parents testify against same-sex marriage by Kirsten Andersen
Domestic Violence: Women can be as abusive as men by Dr Augusto Zimmerman
With the Lord: Wilma Drew
18th Annual Walk and Rally for Life
Former senator speaks up for the unborn by Joe Bullock
Qurans deadly role in inspiring Belgian slaughter by Nabeel Qureshi
Germany:Christian refugees persecuted by Muslims by Soeren Kern
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
by Andrew Lansdown
One for All
A Son to the war
Becoming a Christian
Train home
Sons Laid Down Their Lives
An Accurate Diagnosis
Starting again
Following hard after God
Starving our children
The first duty of fatherhood
The origin of fatherhood
An Easter Song
A Christmas carol
For This Purpose
In royal David's city
God's Placard
Believing the Bible: the issue of inerrancy
Marriage according to scripture
A biblical perspective on prostitution
Prostitution and social justice
Abortion: A biblical perspective
If people were dogs & other false arguments for euthanasia
How porn harms us
How Green is God?
Christians and Politics
When Christians Take Their Lives
The High Kings Watchmen

The Greens' dangerous euthanasia bill


The Greens' dangerous euthanasia bill

On 20thMay 2010 Greens MLC the Hon Robin Chapple introduced his Voluntary Euthanasia Bill 2010 in the Western Australian Legislative Council.

When the president of the council asked if the bill should be read a first time the Hon Nick Goiran (member for South Metro) and some other MLCs loudly responded “No!”. Mr Goiran explained later that although the first reading is usually considered a formality he thought it was important even at that stage to express the view that the Parliament has no business discussing a bill to authorise the killing of the innocent residents of Western Australia.

The Hon Nick Goiran is right. Any law permitting euthanasia would dangerously undermine society’s prohibition of the intentional killing of innocent people, which is an indispensable foundation of the rule of law.

In the light of international experience in the Netherlands and Oregon (USA), as well as experience in the Northern Territory, where euthanasia was legal from 1995-1996, it is clear that it is not possible to enact a law permitting euthanasia that has adequate safeguards to prevent its rampant abuse.

This conclusion would be sufficient reason to oppose this Bill.

However, Mr Chapple’s Voluntary Euthanasia Bill has additional serious flaws. Mr Chapple doesn’t even try to provide the safeguards attempted in the Northern Territory’s Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995.  The Bill has no requirement for any specialist expertise in diagnosing the condition or determining the prognosis.  Nor does it require assessment by a  psychiatrist.

The Bill permits any medical practitioner to give a lethal substance to a person who may:

w    have years to live (for example, if not properly diagnosed);

w    be suffering from depression, suicidal ideation or demoralisation, but is never referred to a psychiatrist for assessment, let alone effective treatment;

w    be suffering no physical pain at all, but who merely states he or she is suffering (which may be solely psychological or emotional suffering) or is debilitated (that is, weak or lacking energy).

Terminal illness is normally defined as six months or less to live. Even then, on many occasions, the diagnosis is wrong and patients sometimes live for years. But, Mr Chapple’s bill defines terminal illness as two years or less to live! It is entirely possible that some patients who could be informed that they only have two years to live might live for many years, or might die of other causes, if they are not actively killed beforehand.

Mr Chapple’s Bill also provides protection to doctors who administer lethal substances and kill their patients upon their request. The Bill provides a level of protection from prosecution for doctors involved in killing that is not available to doctors involved in healing. The provision of this protection will be an incentive for shonky doctors to move away from healing and to killing.

Mr Chapple’s Bill will also force doctors to lie. It requires that doctors list on death certificates the cause of death, not as lethal injection, but as the underlying cause (supposedly from which the patient would/could have died within two years)! Doing so will corrupt proper record keeping and statistics. It will make it difficult, if not impossible, for parliamentarians to determine how the law is working because some death certificates will not cite the real cause of death.

If passed, this dangerous Bill will corrupt doctors; it will corrupt medicine; it will corrupt record keeping; and it will corrupt government.

More alarmingly, it will undermine the protection given to all Western Australians by the law against homicide, and it will place vulnerable people at risk of medicalised homicide. Concerned people should vigorously oppose it.


As this is a matter of vital concern, please write to each of your six members of the Legislative Council, and express your strong opposition to the euthanasia Bill. Their names can be located at the front of the White Pages.


Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
2015 Vol 3 Jul - Sep
2015 Vol 2 Apr - Jun
2015 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2014 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2014 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2014 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2014 Vol 2 Apr - May
2014 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2013 Vol 5 Dec - Jan
2013 Vol 4 Sep - Nov
2013 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2013 Vol 2 Apr - May
2013 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2012 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2012 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2012 Vol 3 May - Jul
2012 Vol 2 Mar - Apr
2012 Vol 1 Jan - Feb
2011 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2011 Vol 2 Apr - May
2011 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2010 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2010 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2010 Vol 2 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 2 Apr - May
2010 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2009 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2009 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2009 Vol 2 Apr - May
2009 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2008 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2008 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2008 Vol 3 Jun - July
2008 Vol 2 Apr - May
2008 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2007 Vol 5 Nov - Jan
2007 Vol 4 Aug - Oct
2007 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2007 Vol 2 Apr - May
2007 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2006 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2006 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2006 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2006 Vol 2 Apr - May
2006 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2005 Vol 6 Dec - Jan
2005 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2005 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2005 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2005 Vol 2 Apr - May
2005 Vol 1 Feb - Mar