Left Menu
Life News
Are we using our memory for the glory of God? by Timothy Raymond
Can we in good conscience vote for Labor? by Andrew Lansdown and Dwight A. Randall
National MP slams perversity of Safe Schools program
Adult children of gay parents testify against same-sex marriage by Kirsten Andersen
Domestic Violence: Women can be as abusive as men by Dr Augusto Zimmerman
With the Lord: Wilma Drew
18th Annual Walk and Rally for Life
Former senator speaks up for the unborn by Joe Bullock
Qurans deadly role in inspiring Belgian slaughter by Nabeel Qureshi
Germany:Christian refugees persecuted by Muslims by Soeren Kern
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
by Andrew Lansdown
One for All
A Son to the war
Becoming a Christian
Train home
Sons Laid Down Their Lives
An Accurate Diagnosis
Starting again
Following hard after God
Starving our children
The first duty of fatherhood
The origin of fatherhood
An Easter Song
A Christmas carol
For This Purpose
In royal David's city
God's Placard
Believing the Bible: the issue of inerrancy
Marriage according to scripture
A biblical perspective on prostitution
Prostitution and social justice
Abortion: A biblical perspective
If people were dogs & other false arguments for euthanasia
How porn harms us
How Green is God?
Christians and Politics
When Christians Take Their Lives
The High Kings Watchmen

Religious liberties under threat in Victoria by Mark Durie


Religious liberties under threat in Victoria

by Mark Durie

The Victorian Parliament is conducting a review of exemptions to Victoria’s Equal Opportunity law. An Options Paper for changing the law has been produced. This review arises out of the introduction of the Victorian human Rights and Responsibilities Charter in 2006. As such it offers an important practical test of the impact of human rights laws.

Human rights can conflict with each other. If one right is to be fully granted, another may need to be limited. For example the right to privacy can impinge upon the right of a community to live in safety, and the right to equal opportunity in employment can conflict with the need of a faith community to employ a leader who shares their beliefs.

These tensions can be mediated by legislation, in a process which has been called ‘balancing’ of rights. For example, the exemptions for religious groups in Equal Opportunity legislation mean that religious freedom rights can overrule equal opportunity rights, under specific circumstances. This allows religious groups to employ staff using a faith test.

The balancing process can result in a ‘hierarchy’ of rights, in which some rights trump other rights, depending upon the circumstances. Up until now, religious rights, through the exemptions system, have tended to rank high in the hierarchy of rights. However, there is growing pressure from secularists to downgrade this status. In other words, there is a demand for religious freedom to be limited, and equality of opportunity to be enhanced.

The argument to downgrade religious rights is essentially twofold. There is a view that religious groups have resorted to special pleading to avoid their human rights responsibilities and this now needs to be corrected. Furthermore, since religion is essentially a private matter—or so it is claimed—full religious freedom should be granted only to those functions which are thought to be ‘internal’ to the religion, such as worship.

For example, it is claimed by secularists that when a church offers a public service, such as a playgroup, a hospice, a counselling centre, or an adoption agency, then religious considerations should give way to other more ‘public’ rights. For example, a parish church might not be allowed to insist on having a Christian playgroup coordinator, as playgroups are—it could be claimed—not a core ‘internal’ function of the Christian religion. A church might also be required to take religious slogans off the walls of the playgroup space, because this would discriminate against non-Christians accessing the service.

The pressure to downgrade religious rights will be felt most by ‘public authorities’ (defined in the Victorian Charter). These are basically bodies providing a service to the public, and especially those in receipt of government funds to meet what is regarded as a responsibility of the state. (At present religious schools are not considered to be public authorities, but this could change.)

These developments are significant, and the impact of changes could be far-reaching. In the UK and parts of the USA the Catholic Church has moved out of adoption services altogether, because submitting to equal opportunity regulations for adoption, including the requirement to adopt out to same-sex couples, would have violated their conscience.

In a worst-case scenario, church agencies might have to withdraw from providing certain services, or else surrender their Christian character to stay in the sector.

Whether or not an agency comes under the direct control of a religious body could be a crucial factor. For example, one of the options before the Victorian parliament is to award a higher level of religious exemptions to schools which are under the direct control of a religious body. A parish primary school might be able to insist on its Christian character in employing staff, but an independent church school might not.

Also under pressure are churches and other faith groups which require employees to sign a code of conduct with conditions relating to faith or sexual ethics. You may still be permitted to ask your parish priest to believe the Creeds and adhere to the principle of no sex outside of marriage, but it could become illegal to require the same of your youth worker or receptionist. (Such is the case in the UK.)

We in Victoria are facing a very real challenge to our religious liberties. It would be an irony if human rights legislation – in the form of the Victorian Charter – creates a trigger to downgrade religious liberty.

With the support of the Greens, the Brumby Government has the numbers in both houses to limit religious freedom in Victoria. It has also now been made clear how and why this could be done. Whether the Government has the will to act, and how far it might be inclined to go, still remains to be seen.


The Revd Dr Mark Durie is an Anglican minister and writer. He is the Vicar of Caulfield (Vic), and has served as a member of a General Synod taskforce on Human Rights and Religious Liberty. See his blog at www.smac.org.au


Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
2015 Vol 3 Jul - Sep
2015 Vol 2 Apr - Jun
2015 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2014 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2014 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2014 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2014 Vol 2 Apr - May
2014 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2013 Vol 5 Dec - Jan
2013 Vol 4 Sep - Nov
2013 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2013 Vol 2 Apr - May
2013 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2012 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2012 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2012 Vol 3 May - Jul
2012 Vol 2 Mar - Apr
2012 Vol 1 Jan - Feb
2011 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2011 Vol 2 Apr - May
2011 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2010 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2010 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2010 Vol 2 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 2 Apr - May
2010 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2009 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2009 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2009 Vol 2 Apr - May
2009 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2008 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2008 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2008 Vol 3 Jun - July
2008 Vol 2 Apr - May
2008 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2007 Vol 5 Nov - Jan
2007 Vol 4 Aug - Oct
2007 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2007 Vol 2 Apr - May
2007 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2006 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2006 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2006 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2006 Vol 2 Apr - May
2006 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2005 Vol 6 Dec - Jan
2005 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2005 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2005 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2005 Vol 2 Apr - May
2005 Vol 1 Feb - Mar