Left Menu
Life News
Are we using our memory for the glory of God? by Timothy Raymond
Can we in good conscience vote for Labor? by Andrew Lansdown and Dwight A. Randall
National MP slams perversity of Safe Schools program
Adult children of gay parents testify against same-sex marriage by Kirsten Andersen
Domestic Violence: Women can be as abusive as men by Dr Augusto Zimmerman
With the Lord: Wilma Drew
18th Annual Walk and Rally for Life
Former senator speaks up for the unborn by Joe Bullock
Qurans deadly role in inspiring Belgian slaughter by Nabeel Qureshi
Germany:Christian refugees persecuted by Muslims by Soeren Kern
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
by Andrew Lansdown
One for All
A Son to the war
Becoming a Christian
Train home
Sons Laid Down Their Lives
An Accurate Diagnosis
Starting again
Following hard after God
Starving our children
The first duty of fatherhood
The origin of fatherhood
An Easter Song
A Christmas carol
For This Purpose
In royal David's city
God's Placard
Believing the Bible: the issue of inerrancy
Marriage according to scripture
A biblical perspective on prostitution
Prostitution and social justice
Abortion: A biblical perspective
If people were dogs & other false arguments for euthanasia
How porn harms us
How Green is God?
Christians and Politics
When Christians Take Their Lives
The High Kings Watchmen

ACL's continuing push for relationship registers


ACL’s continuing push for relationship registers

by Dwight A. Randall


In January of this year the WA Baptist Advocate published on its front page an interview with Jim Wallace, managing director of the Australian Christian Lobby (ACL). The interview dealt with the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Labor Government’s push to legalise civil unions for homosexual and lesbian couples. Jim Wallace actually advocated relationship registers in place of civil unions as a legitimate means of dealing with some supposed matters of “discrimination” against homosexual couples. As the interview could have been read by thousands of Western Australian Christians, we at Life Ministries felt that we should respond briefly to it.

Jim was emphatic in his opposition to civil unions. “This is an article of faith for the new Federal Labor Government,” he said. “It has committed itself not to support civil unions or anything that mimics marriage and we expect the Labor Government to honour its commitment.”

But he was also emphatic about his support for relationship registers: “The registers effectively remove unreasonable discrimination for same-sex couples, such as in terms of an individual’s ability to allocate their own finance and property, without mimicking marriage in the way civil unions or partnerships would.”

This would logically lead to the assumption that there are substantial differences between civil unions and relationship registers, otherwise opposition to one and support for the other wouldn’t make sense. But there are no substantial differences between the two. Relationship registers grant homosexual and lesbian couples virtually all of the privileges that civil unions do.

Andrew Lansdown clearly states Life Ministries’ position in his article “Serious misjudgment: the Australian Christian Lobby advocates a relationships register for homosexual couples” (Life News, June-July 2006). He writes,

ACL is sadly mistaken in its belief that registration of same-sex relationships is less-serious and less marriage-like than same-sex civil unions. But even if it could be established that registration is less significant than civil unions, it still would not justify ACL’s stance. A relationship based on two men having sex together or two women having sex together is not a relationship that merits recognition or support. The relationship itself is unnatural and immoral and ought not to be sanctioned, protected or encouraged in any way by anyone, let alone by a government through legislation. As for the individuals in such a relationship, they currently enjoy all the rights and privileges of any other individual citizen, and properly so. They do not need to be registered and esteemed as a “couple” in order to access those rights. Their claim to “couple” status on the basis of their sexual practice is nonsense, and their demand for social respect and legal privilege on the basis of such an imagined status is outrageous.

In spite of ACL’s claims to the contrary, relationship registers do mimic and harm the special status of marriage in Australia. Therefore, ACL’s claim to be an organisation that staunchly defends marriage as evidenced by their forthright opposition to civil unions is seriously weakened by their support of relationship registers.

While Jim Wallace was responding in the interview in the The Advocate to matters relating to civil unions in the ACT, the legislation there has ramifications that are being felt across the whole nation. Kevin Rudd, prior to becoming Prime Minster, stated clearly his intention to establish relationship registers in every state and territory. That alone would be trouble enough. But to compound matters, ACL supports Rudd’s initiative.

Life Ministries and many other long-standing Christian social action ministries have steadfastly urged ACL to abandon its support for relationship registers, but ACL, not content to let the matter drop, has continued to promote them at church and governmental level across Australia, and even here in Western Australia via publications like the The Advocate.

By supporting relationship registers, ACL has not only caused considerable pain, confusion and discord in the Christian community, it has also split a united approach that had been adopted by pro-family groups for a full generation.

In 2005 Andrew Lansdown cautioned, “it disturbs us to think that should the issue arise in the near future in WA, Life Ministries and like-minded organisations and individuals might have to battle the Australian Christian Lobby along with the homosexual lobby” (“Serious misjudgement; the Australian Christian Lobby advocates a relationships register for homosexual couples”, Life News June/July 2006).
Given Jim’s statement to the WA Baptist Advocate, it seems that our concerns are being realised. We encourage our readers to pray that ACL will abandon this damaging and divisive position, so that we, and other Christian organisations in the West, do not find ourselves in a public fray with ACL regarding relationship registers for homosexual couples.

Additional reading

Life Ministries’ home page contains many articles by various writers expressing opposition to relationship registers: You can read these articles by clicking on the title.
“Serious misjudgment: the Australian Christian Lobby advocates a relationships register for homosexual couples” by Andrew Lansdown:
“Certain issues of justice: same sex relationships and the law” by Andrew Lansdown:
“Same-sex relationships and the law: A response to Brian Edgar” by Roger Birch:
“Concerning the introduction of civil unions: the Christian biblical response” by Peter and Jenny Stokes:
“Salt Shakers response to the Evangelical Alliance paper ‘Same-sex Relationships and the Law’” by Peter and Jenny Stokes:
“Rights and wrongs in relationship recognition” by Bill Muehlenberg:
“Defending marriage against ‘same sex’ registers” by Dwight A. Randall:
“Dangers of a ‘same sex’ register” by Babette Francis:
“Myths and facts about relationship registers” by Festival of Light Australia:
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
Web Design and Development - abcplus Publishing Australia
2015 Vol 3 Jul - Sep
2015 Vol 2 Apr - Jun
2015 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2014 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2014 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2014 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2014 Vol 2 Apr - May
2014 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2013 Vol 5 Dec - Jan
2013 Vol 4 Sep - Nov
2013 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2013 Vol 2 Apr - May
2013 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2012 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2012 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2012 Vol 3 May - Jul
2012 Vol 2 Mar - Apr
2012 Vol 1 Jan - Feb
2011 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2011 Vol 2 Apr - May
2011 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2010 Vol 5 Nov - Dec
2010 Vol 4 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 3 Jun - Aug
2010 Vol 2 Sep - Oct
2010 Vol 2 Apr - May
2010 Vol 1 Jan - Mar
2009 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2009 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2009 Vol 2 Apr - May
2009 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2008 Vol 5 Oct - Dec
2008 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2008 Vol 3 Jun - July
2008 Vol 2 Apr - May
2008 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2007 Vol 5 Nov - Jan
2007 Vol 4 Aug - Oct
2007 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2007 Vol 2 Apr - May
2007 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2006 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2006 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2006 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2006 Vol 2 Apr - May
2006 Vol 1 Feb - Mar
2005 Vol 6 Dec - Jan
2005 Vol 5 Oct - Nov
2005 Vol 4 Aug - Sep
2005 Vol 3 Jun - Jul
2005 Vol 2 Apr - May
2005 Vol 1 Feb - Mar